Showing posts with label Sledging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sledging. Show all posts

Friday, 8 December 2017

Second Ashes Test Sledging result

I was watching the news this evening, observing wintry scenes in North Wales and Scotland featuring children pulling sledges. Ah, sledging! Such an innocent pastime. If only the same could be said of the other meaning of the term, which seems to be applied only to the noble sport of cricket.

In the aftermath of England’s second successive defeat, Johnny Bairstow has said that if Aussie sledging “crosses the line” again, he would “take matters further”.  This statement bothers me for various reasons. I love the idea of opposing players exchanging jokes on the field but verbal abuse designed specifically to unsettle or upset batsmen is totally out of order.

When mentioning ‘crossing the line’, what does he mean? It seems to me that when it comes to sledging, there are no limits, no line. Secondly, for Bairstow and the English squad, they are hardly angels when it comes to the verbals. James Anderson is probably the worst of the current crop, but the likes of Hussain, Prior et al always gave as good as they got. And then there’s the barely veiled threat of reprisals. What does England’s current ‘keeper have in mind? Racing around the pitch swearing and head-butting everyone in a green baggie?

I’ve written before that if you don’t want things to get nasty, it would be very easy for umpires to stamp it out. Three bouts of abuse and you’re off the field with no substitute allowed. The issue of stump microphones is totally irrelevant; it’s what the abuse victim hears which matters, whether Bairstow, Smith or whoever. Some players, as in the wider population, will be better able to withstand abuse, but that doesn’t mean that those less able to do so are weaker individuals and consequently ‘fair game’. Bairstow’s dad committed suicide and so he must be painfully aware of the dangers of mental illness. Perhaps this is why he has made the comments; I don’t know. What would a bowler think if, as a result of persistent offensive ‘banter’, the batsman subsequently retired or did himself harm? I think this is a more dangerous activity than bowling deliveries meant to cause physical harm, and should be banned before something very serious takes place.

Rant over! As for the cricket in Adelaide, Australia opened up a 2-0 Ashes lead to give England palpitations. Joe Root was right to insist there wasn’t a great deal between the sides. Anderson and Woakes bowled well enough with the pink ball to bowl Australia out for 138 in the second innings but, despite Craig Overton’s debutant delight at dismissing Steve Smith first time out, the damage was done on the first two days. The decision to recall Shaun Marsh had been widely derided, yet his unbeaten 126 was by far the highest individual score in the match. The fact that Overton, batting at nine and after a sequence of ducks, top-scored in England’s first innings, must be a concern.

In the series so far, the four-man Aussie attack of Starc, Cummins, Hazlewood and Lyons is looking more formidable than it ought. And now England move to Perth, where they haven’t won for forty years. The notoriously pacey WACA pitch will surely benefit the home pacemen rather than the cannier swing and seam merchants like Anderson, Broad, Woakes and Overton. Root’s poor record at converting fifties to centuries is an issue but at least he scores fifty more frequently than his colleagues. Cook and the supporting cast now need to step up a notch before the series is lost before Father Christmas arrives on his sleigh. That’s sleigh, not sledge. Sadly, cricket proves that you don’t need a snowy slope to participate in that particular pursuit.

Monday, 2 December 2013

Forget Snicko, bring in Sledgo!

After only one match the 2013-14 Ashes is already being discussed less for the cricket than for the sledging. Maybe that's only in England, in which case it's mainly to deflect attention away from the fact that they were completely and utterly outplayed in Brisbane. However, cricketing mythology seems to suggest that the Aussies invented the 'art' of sledging. Whether it was David Boon, Dennis Lillee, Rod Marsh, Merv Hughes, you'd be forgiven for thinking that making innuendo-laden comments about the batsman's wife could only be delivered by a burly bloke wearing an enormous moustache.

Of course, as with most myths, it's not true. Fielders and bowlers have been giving the opposition 'verbals' probably since the game was invented. It's just that there were no TV microphones around to broadcast them to global audiences. I daresay that early 20th century sledging were less likely to end in 'arsewipe' or 'piss off' a la Hughes and Andre Nel, or have the crudity of 'Here comes the f*cking cheat, the f*cking chucker' (Nasser Hussain to Muralitharan, 2003-4). So why don't umpires step in to stop such blatant unprofessinal conduct? Actually, they have done, but more out of exasperation than in an attempt to restore civility to the game. In his book Cricket, Lovely Cricket? Lawrence Booth recounts the time when Dickie Bird once challenged Merv Hughes after the bowler launched a stream of insults aimed at Graeme Hick: "Mervyn, Mervyn what has poor Mr Hick ever done to you?" He was probably shocked when the hairy one retorted with rare wit, "He offended me in a previous life". For once he omitted the normally obligatory 'arsewipe'!

It may well be the case that Steve Waugh's invincibles took sledging to new heights, or depths, becoming as useful attacking tool as a prodigious Shane Warne leg-break or Brett Lee yorker. Then there was Paul Nixon's selection as England's one-day wicketkeeper apparently for his ability to get into the heads of opposition batsmen rather than for his glovework or runs.

Fast forward to 2013 and poor Michael Clarke has been the one pilloried and fined for his remark to Jimmy Anderson. At least the Lancashire paceman could admit that he has dished out more than his fair share in the field, especially during last summer's tour. Some players just grin or turn away, others indulge in a bit of backchat. Horses for courses. If you give it, you have to expect to take it. Dennis Lillee hated to be on the receiving end but if it made him bowl even faster and more accurately then he would have the last laugh.

Some commentators and friends say they enjoy the sledging as much as the cricket itself, but I can't say I agree. Yes, as a fan, listening to the occasional witticism from a fellow spectator in the stands can be very entertaining. It's just that most shouted remarks aren't funny. The more people have to drink, the funnier they think they are but this is in inverse proportion to actual comic ability!

Anyway if sledging is so important to the Ashes series, why not introduce another broadcasting innovation, the Sledgometer or Sledgo? Let's weed out the pathetic and the merely crude and encourage creativity and wit. In between overs, or when Anderson is adjusting his bootlaces for the 79th time, the 3rd umpire should adjudicate on sledging quality. If poor, the sledger should serve a one-hour ban; if good, he can stay. Three bans and you miss a game. A Sledge of the Match award could be added to the interminable trophy ceremonies. There, Sky TV, that should do it....! I just hope that ITV never get their hands on cricket. Imagine the scenario. Each interval, viewers can vote off their least favourite sledger. By day five, it could be eleven playing against one, and Joe Root will have nobody left to face.

Maybe we should just stick to the cricket after all.....