Showing posts with label James Anderson.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Anderson.. Show all posts

Friday, 8 December 2017

Second Ashes Test Sledging result

I was watching the news this evening, observing wintry scenes in North Wales and Scotland featuring children pulling sledges. Ah, sledging! Such an innocent pastime. If only the same could be said of the other meaning of the term, which seems to be applied only to the noble sport of cricket.

In the aftermath of England’s second successive defeat, Johnny Bairstow has said that if Aussie sledging “crosses the line” again, he would “take matters further”.  This statement bothers me for various reasons. I love the idea of opposing players exchanging jokes on the field but verbal abuse designed specifically to unsettle or upset batsmen is totally out of order.

When mentioning ‘crossing the line’, what does he mean? It seems to me that when it comes to sledging, there are no limits, no line. Secondly, for Bairstow and the English squad, they are hardly angels when it comes to the verbals. James Anderson is probably the worst of the current crop, but the likes of Hussain, Prior et al always gave as good as they got. And then there’s the barely veiled threat of reprisals. What does England’s current ‘keeper have in mind? Racing around the pitch swearing and head-butting everyone in a green baggie?

I’ve written before that if you don’t want things to get nasty, it would be very easy for umpires to stamp it out. Three bouts of abuse and you’re off the field with no substitute allowed. The issue of stump microphones is totally irrelevant; it’s what the abuse victim hears which matters, whether Bairstow, Smith or whoever. Some players, as in the wider population, will be better able to withstand abuse, but that doesn’t mean that those less able to do so are weaker individuals and consequently ‘fair game’. Bairstow’s dad committed suicide and so he must be painfully aware of the dangers of mental illness. Perhaps this is why he has made the comments; I don’t know. What would a bowler think if, as a result of persistent offensive ‘banter’, the batsman subsequently retired or did himself harm? I think this is a more dangerous activity than bowling deliveries meant to cause physical harm, and should be banned before something very serious takes place.

Rant over! As for the cricket in Adelaide, Australia opened up a 2-0 Ashes lead to give England palpitations. Joe Root was right to insist there wasn’t a great deal between the sides. Anderson and Woakes bowled well enough with the pink ball to bowl Australia out for 138 in the second innings but, despite Craig Overton’s debutant delight at dismissing Steve Smith first time out, the damage was done on the first two days. The decision to recall Shaun Marsh had been widely derided, yet his unbeaten 126 was by far the highest individual score in the match. The fact that Overton, batting at nine and after a sequence of ducks, top-scored in England’s first innings, must be a concern.

In the series so far, the four-man Aussie attack of Starc, Cummins, Hazlewood and Lyons is looking more formidable than it ought. And now England move to Perth, where they haven’t won for forty years. The notoriously pacey WACA pitch will surely benefit the home pacemen rather than the cannier swing and seam merchants like Anderson, Broad, Woakes and Overton. Root’s poor record at converting fifties to centuries is an issue but at least he scores fifty more frequently than his colleagues. Cook and the supporting cast now need to step up a notch before the series is lost before Father Christmas arrives on his sleigh. That’s sleigh, not sledge. Sadly, cricket proves that you don’t need a snowy slope to participate in that particular pursuit.