Tuesday, 13 March 2018

Cricket’s Fun Factor

The other day I enjoyed reading Barney Ronay’s Guardian article  in which the author extols the virtues of taking pleasure in sport and indeed in seeing others take pleasure in it. He was focussing specifically on football, the ‘beautiful game’ which has been turning progressively uglier with every passing season in direct correlation with the amount of money swilling around in the trough, but it resonates more widely than that.

Most players seem to be losing their engagement with the fans. They arrive at grounds lost in their headphones, alighting from swish coaches making a brief walk to the stadium door seeing only be-suited security managers and a Sky TV cameraman, and never a single supporter. I would once have criticised them for avoiding the very people who pay their wages but that’s no longer true; it’s the TV companies and sponsors who do that. Fans are just people who cover up the rows of seats to make the TV pictures look more interesting. If a supporter tries to contact such a sporting celebrity, at best he or she may pose for a selfie, more likely be ignored, and at worst, if it’s Jamie Carragher, get spat on.

However, I am beginning to see the same principle affecting cricket, if not the beautiful game then the aesthetically pleasing and polite game. I sincerely hope we don’t get to see mobile footage of someone like a Flintoff, Holding or Slater gobbing over an Aussie wind-up merchant gloating over the Ashes or a T20 defeat, but who knows?!

A lot comes down to what we as cricket supporters see on the pitch. I’m no  devotee of Twenty20 but it does at least bring players down to the pitch in full view of spectators and TV viewers instead of hiding behind glass up in the dressing room, swigging sponsors’ beer or poring over a laptop. In the past week, we’ve had De Kock clashing with Warner and, on the pitch, Kagiso Rabada spoiling his electric eleven-wicket haul  at Port Elizabeth by deliberately barging Steve Smith, a second boorish offence resulting in a deserved two-Test ban. Some decry the punishment for seeking to quash natural aggression and passion for the game. Nonsense! Like footballers or pundits propelling spittle at other humans, swearing and charging has nothing to do with passion, only disrespect. It certainly has nothing to do with promoting fun.

In a sport where there’s lots of ‘down’ time – between overs, wickets, sessions, rain delays, etc, much entertainment has to be provided by fans. The chants by dreary drunks can be dull as ditchwater but when I go to a game I always keep an ear out for a witty barb and an eye for a costume worn not necessarily to attract the cameras but for the sheer hell of it. You don’t get that in a two-hour high-pressure cooker of a football match.

And yet of course the players do have a role to play. It’s not just the matter of superb strokes, brilliant bowling and fabulous fielding but the interaction with spectators. It doesn’t matter if there are a few hundred elderly boater wearers and Telegraph readers or twenty thousand pint-wielding twenty-somethings, we all love it when someone patrolling at third man or deep mid-wicket exchanges a few light-hearted quips or gestures with someone the other side of the boundary. Even if the Indian skipper responds to fans singing “Kohli, Kohli, give us a wave” with a simple raise of the hand, it means more than a million press conference interviews.

That’s the fun factor - and heaven help cricket if it disappears.