Tuesday, 9 January 2018

Ashes 2017-18: England save the worst for last

Congratulations, Australia. One more, they made home advantage count and duly wiped the floor with Joe Root’s tourists, extending the winning margin to 4-0 courtesy of an innings victory at a scorching Sydney. It seemed somehow fitting that poor Root was too ill not only to complete his final innings but also to attend the end-of-series presentations.  It also seemed appropriate that Root retired ill having outscored all his colleagues in the final game. One of the other two Englishman to leave with reputation reasonably intact, Jimmy Anderson, was left with the thankless task of trotting out the pleasantries and excuses.

When the Aussies amass 649-7 and then dismiss the opposition for 180, it’s a pretty conclusive result. I commented a few weeks ago that there wasn’t a huge difference between the teams but those words look woefully misjudged today! Steve Smith’s run glut obviously caught the eye but his four-man attack of Cummins, Starc, Hazlewood and indefatigable spinner Nathan Lyon each captured more than 20 wickets. England managed to take only 58 in the whole series.

Both Marsh brothers reached three figures at the SCG while Cook, Bairstow and Malan were England’s only centurions of the series amidst generally pitifully low scoring. Anderson was the only English bowler to average under 35 and also led the wicket table on 17. Moeen Ali, Jake Ball and young Mason Crane each ended with bowling averages in three figures, and the Hampshire leggie was considered to have bowled well! Never mind; 25 years ago, Shane Warne was tonked on his debut, too, and I believe he went on to have quite a useful Test career.

So, in terms of Test cricket, what can Bayliss, Strauss and Root do to stop the rot? First of all – and this might seem perverse - they should forget the Ashes debacle Down Under. 4-0 looks – and was – humiliating but I don’t think any country would have beaten the Aussies this winter. England won at home last time and will probably do the same in 2019, with the likes of Anderson (if fit), Broad, Overton, Roland-Jones and Porter leading the attack.

Short-term, there are Tests to play in New Zealand. Conditions there will be more conducive to Root’s less pacey but perhaps more skilful seam and swing merchants, and the Black Caps don’t have Steve Smith in their line-up. I suggest that England don’t make wholesale changes. Give Ball, Crane and Overton another go but not sure about Tom Curran. He was only picked because of his Surrey connections anyway; certainly not on 2017 county form.

In addition to Moeen, James Vince was perhaps the most disappointing. His one-day batting seems to have matured as his first-class performances have declined. He wasn’t a complete disaster. After all, had Alastair Cook not produced that Melbourne masterclass, his series average would also have loitered in the low 20s at best. Malan and Stoneman must stay, but perhaps Ballance could have another chance to walk to the middle holding a bat instead of drinks tray.

At least England can say they pushed the Aussies into a fifth day every time, a modern rarity. The same can’t be said for India in Cape Town. Kohli’s world leaders played their part but, in the event, they were undone by South Africa’s fast bowlers, led by Vernon Philander. Only 760 runs were scored, not many more than Smith et al compiled in their single Sydney innings. However, unless you held unused tickets for the fifth day, it made for a good contest. Kohli’s men must be strangers to defeat but, on foreign soil, South Africa will surely look to reduce the ranking points difference between the two nations. AB de Villiers and Dale Steyn are back, and that can only be good for cricket, too.